Cipcommunity

Language And Nonsense In Lewis Carrolls Alice Books English Literature Essay

Language And Nonsense In Lewis Carrolls Alice Books English Literature Essay

“ I ‘m really much afraid I did n’t intend anything but bunk. Still, you know, words mean more than we mean to show when we use them ; so a whole book ought to intend a great trade more than the author means. So, whatever good significances are in the book, I ‘m glad to accept as the significance of the book. ”[ 1 ]

Many people think ‘Alice ‘s Adventures in Wonderland ‘ is an illustration of the limit-breaking book from the old tradition lighting the new one. They besides consider it being a narrative. From the expressions of it, the narrative about Alice falling through a rabbit-hole and happening herself in a cockamamie and nonsensical universe is reasonably transparent as a narrative.

The implicit in narrative, the one about a miss maturating off from place in what seems to be a universe ruled by pandemonium and bunk, is rather a scaring one. Alice finds herself confronted in different state of affairss affecting assorted different and funny animate beings being all entirely. She has n’t got any aid at all from place or the universe outside of Wonderland. The subject with Alice turning and shriveling into different sizes could reflect the ups and downs of adolescence with immature people sometimes experiencing grownup and sometimes rather the antonym. One other illustration of maturating is Alice acquiring used to the new sizes she grows. She talks to her pess and learns some of the new ways her organic structure works in. Her feelings are much shaken from her escapades and she cries rather frequently when it ‘s impossible to obey the regulations of the Wonderland – or is it adulthood? “ Everything is so out-of-the-way down here ” , as Alice frequently repeats to herself.

Carroll is an expert at wordplaies and sarcasm. The portion with the huffy tea-party is one of the best illustrations of this. MAD TEA PARTY

There ‘s a batch of temper in the first Alice book, but in the 2nd the temper gets a spot darker and more melancholiacs.

The quotation mark “ Everyone in Wonderland is huffy, otherwise they would n’t be down here ” told by the Cheshire Cat can be given an experiential significance. Is it that everyone alive is huffy being alive, or everyone woolgathering him- or herself off is huffy due to the flight from world? Time is a really cardinal subject in the narrative. The Hatter ‘s ticker shows yearss because “ it ‘s ever six O ‘ clock and tea-time ” . Time affairs in turning up, I guess, but farther readings are left unexpressed.

The first manuscript was called ‘Alice ‘s Adventures Underground ‘ , and that some – at least the Swedish – interlingual rendition of the rubric is a bit equivocal, it becomes more evident, that the universe Alice enters is n’t merely any kids ‘s ‘ resort area, but a slightly awful and unsafe topographic point for maturating. It becomes more interesting when Alice eventually gets into the garden and finds a battalion of cards governing it, with a really evil queen at its caput. It appears to be a manner of stating that the garden is n’t truly what it appears to be.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.alice-in-wonderland.net/explain/alice841.html

Humpty Dumpty informs Alice that ‘there are three hundred and sixty four yearss when you might acquire un-birthday nowadayss. His statement is another augmentation to one of the oldest and fundamental philosophical contentions: whether Non-Being, like Being, exists.A In theA SophistA duologue, Plato argues that what ‘is non ‘ in some sense besides ‘is ‘ , rebuting Parmenides ‘ construct of the impossibleness of the Non-Being to be. Non-Being is merely a being characterised merely by its difference from ‘another ‘ being. Carroll was no alien to Greek doctrine.

Carroll is over and over once more seen to be fascinated by the thought that Nothingness is more than what meets the oculus:

‘Take some more tea, ‘ the March Hare said to Alice, really earnestly.A

‘I ‘ve had nil yet, ‘Alice replied in an pained tone, ‘so I ca n’t take more. ‘

‘You mean you ca n’t take LESS, ‘said the Hatmaker: ‘it ‘s really easy to take MORE than nil. ‘[ 2 ]

The Hatter told Alice that he ‘knew Time ‘ and that one can non ‘talk about blowing it ‘ because Time is ‘him ‘ . Time, says the Hatter, is person that if you merely ‘knew how to maintain on good footings with him, he ‘d make about anything you liked with the clock, you could maintain it to half-past one every bit long as you liked. ‘[ 3 ]

To Humpty Dumpty, every bit good as to the Hatter, Time is a existent entity. Once we become cognizant of this world, Plato ‘s construct presents no hinderance to the being of either birthdays or un-birthdays. As with Time, Numbers excessively are portrayed by Carroll as existent entities. Upon come ining the garden Alice comes up to three card nurserymans presented by Carroll as Two, Five and Seven. To Carroll, the Christ Church mathematician, Numbers, like Time, are more than merely abstract figures – they are existent Beings. Carroll venerates here Pythagoras ‘ construct about Numbers. Aristotle records that the Pythagoreans held that Numbers were: the first things in the whole of nature ‘ and that ‘the elements of Numberss are the elements of all things’A

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.alice-in-wonderland.net/school/alice1017.html

Language plays many functions in ‘Alice ‘s Adventures in the Wonderland ‘ . Carroll illustrates Alice ‘s powers of ground, gives her individuality and explores regulations of conversation.

From the beginning of the book, Carroll portrays Alice as a unusually intelligent small miss, showing this through her verbal logical thinking. After imbibing the bottle and shriveling down to the proper size for come ining the garden, she finds she has left the key to the garden on the tabular array, now far above her caput. Finding a bar that will probably bring forth another alteration in her size, she decides to eat it. ‘If it makes me grow larger, I can make the key ; and if it makes me turn smaller, I can crawl under the door: so both manner I ‘ll acquire into the garden, and I do n’t care which happens ‘ .[ 4 ]Alice sagely recognizes that any alteration in size, whether it be smaller or larger, can accommodate her purpose.A

Alice ‘s power of concluding seem to be unequal to a small miss ‘s character. One could surely reason that Alice ‘s fearless logical thinking as to the advantages of eating the bar is uncharacteristic of a child.A

However, even while Carroll uses Alice ‘s concluding to pull attending to her, he skilfully weaves Alice ‘s infantile nature into her words, as when she announces: ‘and I do n’t care which happens! ‘[ 5 ]. Despite her intuitive logical thinking, her address is still infantile. Indeed, Alice ‘s logical thinking is ever stated obviously, as a kid might conceivably talk. At the huffy tea party, when the Dormouse is stating his narrative, Alice keeps disrupting. Noting disagreements in the narrative that the others seem to overlook, she says: ‘But I do n’t understand. Where did they pull the golden syrup from? ‘[ 6 ]Alice has observed that it is hard to pull something out of a well if you are already in the well, yet the remainder of the characters treat Alice ‘s inquiries with restlessness. Despite the sense of her inquiries, they are phrased as a kid inquiring, ‘why? ‘ repeatedly, which keeps her in character for a small girl even as she displays her intelligence. In this mode her concluding bases out from the complexnesss of the absurd Wonderland.A

Another map of linguistic communication in Alice in Wonderland is to research Alice ‘s individuality. Harmonizing to Martin Heidegger[ 7 ], human individuality is dependants on linguistic communication. Alice shows grounds of this individuality through linguistic communication. Having found her size so suddenly altered with eating the bar, she inquiries if she is still herself: A

‘Let me believe: was I the same when I got up this forenoon? I about think I can retrieve experiencing a small different. But if I ‘m non the same, the following inquiry is ‘Who in the universe am I? Ah, that ‘s the great mystifier! ‘[ 8 ]

And she began believing over all the kids she knew that were of the same age as her, to see if she could hold been changed for any of them.

Carroll besides explores the regulations or societal conventions of linguistic communication. Early on in the narrative, Alice strikes up a conversation with a mouse. She merely succeeds in piquing it, nevertheless, by speaking about cats: A

‘Oh, I beg your forgiveness! ‘ cried Alice hurriedly, afraid that she had hurt the hapless animate being ‘s feelings. ‘I rather forgot you did n’t like cats. ‘

‘Not like cats! ‘ cried the Mouse in a shrill, passionate voice. ‘Would you like cats, if you were me? ‘[ 9 ]A

Throughout her clip in Wonderland, Alice learns to set her conversation subjects to her size, and non pique animals with reminders of where they rank on the nutrient concatenation. She demonstrates her new apprehension of Wonderland ‘s regulations of etiquette during her visit with the Mock Turtle: A

‘Oh, as to the whiting, ‘ said the Mock Turtle, ‘they – you ‘ve seen them, or class? ‘A

‘Yes, ‘ said Alice, ‘I ‘ve frequently seen them at dinn – ‘ she checked herself hurriedly.[ 10 ]A

Alice has learned from her old brushs with Wonderland animals what is considered violative by the regulations of linguistic communication, and stops herself merely in clip from adverting that in her universe, whiting are nutrient, non friends.A

‘If any one of them can explicate it, ‘ said Alice, ( she had grown so big in the last few proceedingss that she was n’t a spot afraid of disrupting him, ) ‘I ‘ll give him tanner. I do n’t believe there ‘s an atom of significance in it. ‘

‘If there ‘s no significance in it, ‘ said the King, ‘that saves a universe of problem, you know, as we need n’t seek to happen any. And yet I do n’t cognize, ‘ he went on, distributing out the poetries on his articulatio genus, and looking at them with one oculus ; ‘I seem to see some significance in them, after all. ‘[ 11 ]

The King so proceeds to dissect the verse form in order to happen its significance. He is, in fact, analysing the verse form with the reading already decided upon – a false belief that is all excessively easy for an fanatic bookman to perpetrate. Alice, on the other manus, is willing to take the verse form at face value – as a verse form and nil more – thereby exposing the artlessness that Sontag so wistfully describes. Using the struggle between the King and Alice, Carroll makes a statement about the danger of seeking to read excessively much into a work of art.A

Lewis Carroll ‘s ‘Alice in Wonderland ‘ is a great geographic expedition of linguistic communication. Carroll uses linguistic communication to put Alice apart as intelligent, even while he uses simpleness of enunciation to demo that she is still a small miss. Using a mixture of self-contemplation and conversation, Carroll explores the issue of individuality, successfully showing that Alice ‘s individuality through her logical thinking abilities, even though she herself uncertainties who she is. Carroll besides plays with the regulations of linguistic communication and how they are learned, by seting Alice in unheard of state of affairss and showing how she learns the new Torahs of conversation etiquette. Finally, by demoing the absurdness of utilizing a verse form as condemnable grounds, Carroll berates his readers for seeking to read excessively much into his ain narrative. The many functions of linguistic communication in ‘Alice in Wonderland ‘ show Carroll ‘s accomplishment at pull stringsing words to do his points.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.associatedcontent.com/article/13706/the_roles_of_language_in_alice_in_wonderland.html? cat=38

Carroll makes a contrast between the absurdness of the secret plan and the reason behind the character ‘s comprehension of Alice ‘s linguistic communication and their actual use of words, phrases, and names. Carroll toys with lingual conventions in the Through the Looking Glass, doing usage of wordplaies and playing on multiple significances of words throughout the text. The writer creates words and looks and even invents new significances for words.

But even after a sense of the form is established, the perceptive usage continues to surprise. This method pushes readers to analyze the usage of linguistic communication and articulation. Anything is possible in Wonderland, and Carroll ‘s use of linguistic communication reflects this sense of limitless possibility.

Written in nonsensical poetry, “ Jabberwocky ” is about a satirical heroic lay that embodies Lewis Carroll ‘s inventive linguistic communication drama. The verse form creates an altered sense of intending through invented words. These invented words have English properties and are simple to read and state, they merely do non hold intending outside the context of the verse form. he lyrical agreement, sound of the syllables, and arrangement in the syntax give many hints as to each words significance, but no precise definition can be determined. “ Jabberwocky ” shows how words void of any significance in and of themselves can hold power, tone, and feeling. After reading it Alice is merely certain of one thing, “ somebodyA killedA something ” ( Carroll 97 ) .Later in the narrative, Carroll revisits the subject of names and the verse form “ Jabberwocky ” when Alice meets Humpty Dumpty. Humpty Dumpty, who seems to be replacing words at will, state Alice he can command of his words every bit good as their significances.

Shortly before run intoing Humpty Dumpty, in chapter four, Alice meets a brace of twins who seem to be cryptically under the control of linguistic communication. Tweedledee and Tweedledum are twins who converse in a mode proposing a difference of sentiment as Tweedledee frequently comments “ Contrariwise! ” However that which follows this curse does n’t of all time look to be contrary as exhibited when Tweedledum tells Alice “ I know what you ‘re believing aboutaˆ¦but it is n’t so, nohow, ” the other follows adding “ Contrariwiseaˆ¦if it was so, it might be ; and if it were so, it would be ; but as it is n’t, it ai n’t. That ‘s logic ” ( Carroll 114 ) . The recitation of a nursery rime about the two has prognostic powers in Looking-glass universe.

Wordss seem to originate their conflict readyings, as if Tweedledum and Tweedledee are predestined by the rimes she recites, similar to the White Queen stating Alice she remembers “ things that happen hebdomad after following ” ( Carroll 126 ) . The foretold actions and emotions of Tweedledee and Tweedledum illustrate that linguistic communication can hold existent power and influence, a message reiterated by the conflict of the Lion and the Unicorn.

Lewis Carroll ‘s apparently absurd destabilization of linguistic communication has the ability to notice on linguistic communication in society in a alone and simplistic mode. This is exhibited with great easiness and admirable signifier while seeing Carroll ‘s screaming characters and state of affairss run a changeless discourse on the nature and possibilities of linguistic communication. He creates a dichotomy in his intervention of linguistic communication in Alice ‘s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. By dividing words from significances and names from persons, Carroll implies an emptiness of words and phrases. However, he besides infuses linguistic communication with the power to make existent results and words with power to hold several significances. Language, like life, can worsen and confound, but it besides contains possibilities that goes unrecognised everyday.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.suite101.com/content/properties-of-language-alices-adventures-in-wonderland-a229304

In decision Carroll ‘s wonderland charters ( all grownups ) “ are complete jeers of the grownups that Victorian kids had to obey. “ ( Hayes, 2 ) They show the ignorance and absurdness of their clip. Yet Carroll does demo a note of hope. At the terminal of the first book Alice stands up and expresses her feelings that the whole test is nonsensical and that the “ soldiers ” were merely a battalion of cards. In the 2nd book Alice, sick of the pandemonium and confusion, summons the bravery to dispute the Red Queen. With these two accomplishments Alice breaks “ the enchantment of the domineering, inhibitory authorization figures ” ( Makinen, 2 ) and gives hope that in world this could besides be possible.

hypertext transfer protocol: //www.echeat.com/essay.php? t=25907

Meaning, harmonizing to Humpty Dumpty: ‘We ‘ve had sufficiency of that topic, and it would be merely every bit good if you mention what you mean to make next, as I suppose you do n’t intend to halt here all the remainder of your life. ‘[ 12 ]